Kassu

Instant Bank Transfers at UK Casinos: What to Check

Updated October 2026
Licensed
gbAvailable in GB
Fast payouts
18+ Only

Bank transfer availability and conditions can vary by operator and account, so the live cashier is the practical place to confirm them.

How Bank Transfers Fit into Online Casino Cashiers

A bank transfer is one possible way to fund a casino account, but it is not a standard feature with identical terms across every operator. The payment choices and conditions shown at a particular casino are set out in its own cashier. That information can depend on the selected payment method and may change, so a description of bank transfers in general cannot establish what a specific account can use at the time of payment.

This distinction matters when comparing an online casino bank transfer with other ways of depositing. A payment option may be discussed on a casino’s general information pages without being presented in the cashier for a particular account. Conversely, the cashier may provide account-specific details that a general description does not include. The live payment screen is therefore the practical point at which availability and terms can be assessed; a broad label such as “bank transfer” does not, by itself, define the transaction.

For a UK player, the relevant information should be read in the context of the operator’s UKGC licence and the account’s own payment options. Remote gambling operators serving the British market are required to hold a Gambling Commission licence. That requirement does not make every cashier identical, or establish that any particular bank transfer route is offered. The cashier remains the operator-specific record of the methods and conditions presented for the account.

The cashier sets the transaction terms

The operator’s own payment information should be checked before a deposit is made. In particular, the cashier should state the minimum deposit and maximum transaction value for the selected method, as well as any fee. Those terms should not be inferred from another casino’s payment page, since a limit or charge displayed by one operator is not evidence of the terms at another.

A specialist review may describe payment arrangements, but it is not a substitute for the operator’s current cashier. Reviews can be prepared at a different time or may summarise terms that have since changed. The same caution applies to general statements about what a bank transfer costs or how much it can move: without the relevant cashier details, those statements do not settle the conditions for a particular deposit.

iPad Casinos UK: Browser Access, Apps and Payments

The selected payment method also matters. The available transaction limits, fees and processing statements can differ between methods, including methods that appear within the same cashier. A bank transfer should therefore be assessed on the terms displayed for that option, rather than on assumptions drawn from another payment route. If the cashier does not make a condition clear, the transaction should not be treated as though the missing detail had been confirmed.

The amount entered for a deposit should remain within the cashier’s stated boundaries. A displayed minimum is not a recommendation to deposit that amount, and the presence of a maximum does not imply that a player should approach it. These are transaction conditions, not guidance about how much to gamble. The account’s financial-limit controls are a separate part of the decision and should be considered before funding the account.

Financial limits and payment decisions

UK rules require a new remote customer to be prompted to consider setting a financial limit before making a first deposit. Account-level limit facilities must also remain accessible after that point. This safeguard is distinct from the cashier’s payment limits: the cashier describes what can be processed through a method, while an account limit concerns the customer’s chosen control over spending. Both should be considered before a deposit is submitted.

The legal payment rules also affect how deposits can be funded. Remote gambling operators must not accept credit-card payments for gambling, including where a payment is routed through a money service business. A bank transfer should not be treated as a way to sidestep that restriction. The payment must come through a permitted route, and the cashier’s description should be read alongside the operator’s applicable terms.

A payment option appearing on screen does not remove the need to review the transaction before confirming it. The selected method, the amount, any displayed fee and the applicable limits should correspond to the account’s current cashier information. Where the cashier offers several routes, each has its own conditions; one method’s terms cannot safely be applied to another.

Credit Card Ban

Remote gambling operators must not accept credit-card payments for gambling, including those routed through a money service business.

This also explains why broad claims about a “best” bank transfer casino cannot settle the practical question. A ranking cannot establish the live limits or fees for an individual account, and a general description cannot show whether the account’s cashier presents the same terms at the time of deposit. The useful comparison begins with the payment details actually supplied by each operator, not with a universal assumption about bank transfers.

For an online casino with bank transfer as a cashier option, the decision is consequently tied to the current payment screen and the account’s financial controls. The method name identifies a route for funding the account; it does not promise uniform charges, limits or processing conditions across casino sites. Careful reading of the operator’s own information keeps those separate questions visible before a payment is made.

Assessing Bank Transfer Deposit Options

A useful comparison of a bank transfer deposit starts with the transaction terms shown for the selected method, not with a label such as “best” or “fast”. A specialist review can provide a starting point for what to examine, but the figures and conditions that matter are those displayed in the casino’s live cashier. Minimums, maximum transaction values, fees and processing statements can differ by operator and payment method, and may change over time.

Tether at UK Casinos: Payment Options and Limits

Compare like with like

A comparison is meaningful only when the same fields are checked for each option. The deposit minimum indicates whether a payment can be made at the intended amount; the maximum transaction value shows whether the method accommodates a larger deposit. Fees affect the amount charged or credited, so the cashier’s wording should be read carefully rather than assuming that a transfer is cost-free. If the operator displays a processing statement, it should be recorded as a stated condition, not treated as a guaranteed outcome for every transaction.

These details should be considered together. A low minimum does not, by itself, make an option preferable if its maximum is unsuitable or a fee changes the cost. Likewise, a high transaction ceiling says little about whether a deposit fits an account’s financial limits. Comparisons based on old review tables can therefore be misleading: the payment conditions may have been revised since the information was published.

A practical record can be brief:

This is not a ranking system. It makes the terms visible so that different options can be assessed on consistent grounds. Where a cashier does not clearly identify a condition, that uncertainty should not be converted into an assumed figure or a claim that the method is more favourable.

Treat “best” as a set of criteria

There is no sound basis for calling one bank transfer option the best for every account. The relevant choice depends on the terms that apply to the proposed deposit, including its amount, the payment method selected and the limits set on the account. A bank transfer casino deposit should therefore be assessed against those conditions rather than against a general promotional description.

The same principle applies to claims of an instant or fast deposit. Such wording does not replace the transaction details, and it should not be used as a substitute for a stated processing condition. Since this comparison concerns deposit terms, speed should be treated only as one item to verify where the cashier provides relevant information, not as a reason to infer that all transfers at a site will be handled alike.

Do

Don’t

A specialist review may outline the fields worth checking, but it cannot establish that a displayed condition still applies to a particular account. The cashier is where the current deposit method and its transaction terms are presented. For a careful comparison, the cashier information should take precedence over a ranking that does not show when its conditions were checked or which method they describe.

Include account controls in the comparison

The amount available to deposit is not determined solely by the payment method. Account financial-limit controls also matter. Before a first deposit, a new remote customer must be prompted to consider setting a financial limit; after that, the account must continue to provide access to limit facilities. The deposit option should be considered alongside those controls, rather than as a way to set aside an account limit.

This distinction prevents a misleading comparison. A cashier’s maximum transaction value is a payment condition; an account financial limit is a separate control. Neither should be mistaken for the other, and the presence of one does not establish the setting of the other. A deposit that is within the payment method’s displayed range may still be incompatible with an account’s own limit.

Casinos That Accept Bank Cheques in the UK

Check the terms at the point of comparison

Because deposit minimums, maximums, fees and processing conditions depend on the live cashier and selected method, a comparison should be made close to the time of payment. If the cashier changes after an earlier review was read, the newer display is the relevant one. The figures should be checked before confirming the transaction, not reconstructed from a general description of bank transfers.

This approach produces a more defensible assessment than an unsupported “best” label. It identifies the actual conditions attached to the deposit, separates payment limits from account controls, and avoids treating a temporary cashier display as a permanent feature of a casino. A favourable option is one whose current terms fit the account’s requirements; the evidence for that judgement is the stated deposit condition, not the strength of a ranking claim.

Checking Which Online Casinos Support Bank Transfers

A casino’s payment page can indicate that bank transfer is supported, but a general description is not the same as a current option in its cashier. Payment methods can be added, removed or presented differently over time. For that reason, a bank transfer casino list should be treated as a starting point for checking, not as confirmation that a particular operator will accept a transfer when a deposit is attempted.

A bank transfer casino list should be treated as a starting point for checking, not as confirmation that a particular operator will accept a transfer when a deposit is attempted.

The relevant evidence is the operator’s live cashier. It shows which methods are available at the point of transaction and can clarify whether a bank transfer is offered for the account in question. A method described on a landing page, in an older review or in a third-party payment guide may no longer be selectable. Even a recently published overview cannot establish current availability as reliably as the operator’s own payment interface.

This distinction matters when comparing online casinos that appear to accept direct bank transfers. The label may cover a payment route that is not available at every operator, or may be used in descriptions that do not explain how the transaction is processed. Without a current cashier option, a claim that an online casino supports bank transfer remains unconfirmed. The same caution applies to claims about fast bank transfers: the presence of the payment method alone does not establish how quickly a transaction will be processed.

Reviews can still help identify operators worth checking, but they have a different evidential role. A specialist review can describe the payment options observed during its assessment; it cannot guarantee that the same options remain available later. Reviews may also combine information about deposits and withdrawals, although the available routes need not be identical. A list of casinos described as accepting transfers should therefore not be read as a definitive or permanent directory.

The operator’s own information is also subject to change. A page can remain online after a cashier option has been revised, so consistency between the public payment page and the live deposit screen is useful to establish. Where they differ, the current cashier provides the stronger indication of what can actually be selected. If the method is not shown there, older descriptions do not establish that it is currently accepted.

Casinos That Accept Ethereum in the UK: Payment Checks

Legal status is a separate part of the assessment. Remote gambling operators selling into the British market must hold a UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where they are based. A payment method appearing on a site does not establish that the operator is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain. Bank transfer availability and regulatory status are therefore distinct questions; evidence for one does not answer the other.

A sound comparison begins by separating confirmed availability from reported availability. A casino can be included as a possible candidate when a current review mentions bank transfers, but its cashier needs to be checked before relying on that description. The comparison should record whether the transfer option is visible, rather than treating a broad payment claim as settled. This avoids turning a list of supposed top bank transfer casinos into an unsupported ranking.

Deposit access should also be considered alongside the account’s payout information and the operator’s current terms. A specialist review may report withdrawal methods or conditions, but those statements can change. Before depositing, the available payout route for the account, any outstanding identity checks and the current operator terms need to be established. A transfer option at the deposit stage does not by itself confirm the route available for a later withdrawal.

Accordingly, the phrase “bank transfer casinos UK” describes a category to investigate, not a stable set of sites. Current cashier evidence can confirm whether a particular operator presents the method at the time of checking. Reviews and archived payment pages can provide context, but they cannot replace that confirmation or guarantee that availability will persist.

Regulatory and Payment Status

What “Instant” Means for a Bank Transfer Casino

The word “instant” can describe a payment label without establishing how quickly money will reach a casino account. It is therefore not, by itself, a verified processing-time claim. A casino may present a bank transfer option as instant, but the label needs to be read alongside the cashier’s explanation of what happens and when.

Timing can refer to different stages. A payment may be submitted, acknowledged by a bank or payment provider, accepted by the operator, and then shown in the casino balance. Those events are not necessarily simultaneous. Unless the operator specifies which stage its wording covers, “instant” does not establish that a deposit will be available for use immediately after a transfer is initiated.

The same distinction matters when a payment description refers to a fast transfer. That wording may describe the payment service or the way a transaction is started, rather than the time taken for the casino to credit funds. A claim about speed is more informative when it identifies the relevant event and states the conditions under which the timing applies. Without those details, comparisons between an instant bank transfer casino and another payment option may rest on unlike meanings of “instant”.

A specialist review of payment terms reports that public banking information does not establish stable UK-specific figures for processing times, fees or withdrawal limits. It identifies the live cashier as the definitive place to check current conditions. The review’s observation is a reason to avoid treating a general description of bank transfers as a promise about a particular casino transaction: the operator and the selected payment method determine the terms shown at the time.

Casinos That Accept Neteller in the UK

A separate specialist review notes that deposit and withdrawal processing times, as well as applicable minimums, maximums and fees, depend on the live cashier and payment method. These conditions can differ between operators and may change. A timing statement found in an older review or a general payment guide may not describe the option currently displayed to an account holder. Nor does a deposit-time claim establish how quickly a later transaction will be handled.

For a meaningful assessment, the cashier’s wording should be checked for the point at which its stated timing begins and ends. It should also be clear whether the statement concerns deposits or withdrawals, and whether it describes an estimate or a guaranteed outcome. If those distinctions are absent, the label supports only a limited conclusion: the operator associates the option with speed, but the exact time to completion remains unspecified.

This is particularly relevant to the phrase “instant bank transfer casino UK”. It can suggest a uniform service across UK casinos, although transaction conditions are operator-specific. A bank transfer presented as instant at one casino does not establish that the same method, definition or timing applies elsewhere. The label should therefore be treated as a description to verify in the current cashier, not as a reliable measure on its own.

How “Instant” is defined

Timing can refer to different stages: submission, bank acknowledgement, operator acceptance, and finally the casino balance update. Unless specified, “instant” does not guarantee immediate availability of funds.

Top online casinos in the UK

  1. SpinFormula
    Bonus: 550% Up To £15,000 + 550 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  2. Amunbet
    Bonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  3. NightWin
    Bonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  4. NightLuck
    Bonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  5. Dieselwin
    Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  6. Britsino
    Bonus: Welcome Package – Get your £2,200 + 2,000 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  7. WinBeast
    Bonus: €5000 + 500 FS + €650 Freebet · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  8. EvoSpin
    Bonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  9. Jetsetspins
    Bonus: 200% Bonus + 100 Free Spins + Free Royal Wheel · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
  10. BeOnBet
    Bonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

Bank Transfers, Casino Access and Slot Availability

A bank transfer concerns how money enters a casino account; it does not, by itself, determine which games that account can access. A site may show a broad slot catalogue while offering only selected deposit methods in its cashier. Conversely, a bank transfer option does not indicate that the catalogue contains any particular slot. Payment access and game access are separate features of the operator’s service.

This distinction matters when comparing a casino that accepts bank transfers with one that offers a different payment route. The cashier describes the available ways to fund an account, while the game lobby presents the titles made available by the operator. Searching the lobby for slots does not establish whether bank transfer is accepted, and seeing bank transfer in payment information does not establish which games are playable. Each detail requires its own confirmation.

The same applies to descriptions such as “instant” bank transfer. A label attached to a payment route is not evidence about the range of slots on offer, nor does it show that every part of account access will happen at the same pace. A payment may be available as a deposit method while game access remains subject to the operator’s account requirements. The two questions should not be treated as interchangeable.

A bank transfer also does not establish a matching route for a later casino withdrawal. Deposit and payout arrangements are separate conditions, and an account’s eligibility for a payout route may depend on information or checks associated with that account. A specialist review notes that a deposit method should not be assumed to serve for withdrawals as well; this is a point to verify against the operator’s current terms, not a universal description of every site.

Casinos That Accept Wirecard in the UK

Before funds are deposited, the relevant account conditions include the payout route available to that account, any identity checks still outstanding, and the operator’s current terms. These checks relate to settlement and account status rather than to the slot catalogue. A casino may display games to visitors or account holders while applying separate requirements to deposits, play, or withdrawals.

Accordingly, “slots with bank transfer” is best understood as shorthand for slots available at a casino whose cashier may accept bank transfers. It does not mean that a bank transfer is made for an individual game, or that a particular title is tied to that payment method. Nor does a listing of casino sites with bank transfer settle whether the same method can be used to receive winnings.

For a useful comparison, the catalogue and the payment arrangements need to be assessed independently. Game availability is established through the casino’s own lobby and terms; payment and payout conditions are established through the relevant account information and cashier. Treating either as proof of the other risks confusing access to games with the separate movement of funds.

Fast Transfers at Casino Sites: Limits of the Evidence

Descriptions of fast bank transfers at casino sites need to be read as claims about particular payment arrangements, not as a general property of bank transfers. The time associated with a transaction can depend on the method selected and the conditions shown in the operator’s live cashier. A speed statement detached from those details cannot establish what a player will experience in a different account or at a later date.

Attention: A site’s statement about how quickly money can be added to an account should not be treated as a statement about how quickly a withdrawal will be processed.

A specialist review reports that deposit and withdrawal processing times, alongside transaction minimums, maximums and fees, depend on the selected method and the live cashier. Those conditions are therefore relevant to any claim that a site offers a fast transfer. A headline description may not show whether it refers to a deposit, a withdrawal, or both; nor does it establish that the same timing applies to every bank or account.

The distinction matters because a deposit and a payout are separate transactions. A site’s statement about how quickly money can be added to an account should not be treated as a statement about how quickly a withdrawal will be processed. Withdrawal methods, limits, fees and processing descriptions can also change. A claim seen in an older review or payment summary may no longer describe the current arrangement.

Comparisons between bank transfer casino sites are most meaningful when they refer to the same transaction direction and the same stated conditions. Without that alignment, calling one site faster than another may compare different stages of payment or different methods. The label “fast” alone does not supply a measurable basis for a ranking of fast bank transfer casino sites in the UK.

The same caution applies to phrases such as “instant bank transfer”. A label does not, by itself, specify when processing begins, what stage is being described, or whether the claim concerns deposits or withdrawals. The relevant point is the operator’s current transaction information for the chosen method, rather than a broad claim presented without context.

Casinos That Accept UKash in the UK: What to Check

Searches for bank transfer slots or bank transfer slot sites can also make the payment route sound like a feature of the games. It is not. A bank transfer funds a casino account; it does not establish that a particular slot is available, or that a game session will be funded instantly. Any speed statement concerns the payment transaction, not the operation of a slot.

For a sound comparison, statements about speed need to be treated as time-sensitive and specific to the transaction described. Where the cashier’s current terms differ from a general site description, the live transaction conditions are the more relevant account of what applies. A fast-transfer claim should not be extended beyond its stated method, direction or conditions.

Confirming Bank Transfer Acceptance Before Depositing

A casino’s general payment information does not confirm that bank transfer is available to every account at the moment of payment. The practical check is the deposit cashier after signing in: the method should appear as a selectable option, with its conditions displayed before the transaction is submitted. If bank transfer is absent, unavailable or described unclearly, that is not confirmation of acceptance.

The cashier should also be checked for the terms attached to the selected method. A specialist review of casino payment conditions advises checking the minimum deposit, maximum transaction value and any fee shown for the transfer. These details should be read together: a method can be listed while its permitted transaction range or cost makes it unsuitable for a particular deposit. The displayed terms, rather than a general claim that a casino accepts transfers, are the relevant evidence.

Pre-Deposit Verification

Account controls are part of the same pre-deposit check. New remote customers must be invited to consider setting a financial limit before making a first deposit, and the account should provide access to limit facilities afterwards. The deposit process should not be treated as complete until the applicable controls and the amount being committed have been considered.

Acceptance for deposits does not establish how funds can later be paid out. A specialist review also recommends confirming the payout route available to the account, whether identity checks remain outstanding and which current operator terms apply. This can identify a mismatch between the method used to fund the account and the route permitted for a later withdrawal. The account holder’s details and currency should correspond to the chosen route; a payment option shown for deposits alone is not evidence that it will be available for payouts.

For a mobile account, the same checks apply through the cashier displayed on the device. A mobile layout may present payment options differently, so the method’s name and transaction conditions need to be visible before confirmation. A reference to fast or instant bank transfer does not replace this check: it does not, by itself, establish that the route is currently offered to that account or set out the terms governing the transaction.

A sound confirmation is therefore specific to the account and the payment stage: bank transfer is selectable, the deposit conditions are clear, financial-limit controls have been considered, and payout eligibility, identity status and current terms have been reviewed. If any of those points cannot be established in the cashier or account information, acceptance should not be assumed.

Current Cashier Information for Bank Transfer Sites

A casino’s general payment page can describe bank transfers, but it may not reflect the terms currently attached to an account or payment option. The live cashier is the more dependable place to check the conditions in force when a transaction is being considered. Static site descriptions and older payment summaries can become outdated as operators revise their available routes or terms.

A specialist review of banking information notes that it does not establish stable UK-specific figures for bank-transfer withdrawal limits, fees or processing times. Those details need to be checked in the operator’s cashier rather than inferred from general banking guidance. The same caution applies to statements about how quickly a payout will arrive: a published description is not necessarily a current, account-specific processing commitment.

Withdrawal methods, limits, fees and processing statements can change over time. Consequently, a page describing a top bank-transfer casino site, or characterising a service as a fast option, cannot by itself establish the terms available at the point of payment. Such descriptions may help identify what to inspect, but they should not replace current operator information.

The cashier should be treated as a transactional source, not merely a list of logos or payment labels. Its displayed terms can clarify which routes are presently offered and the conditions attached to them. If the relevant details are absent or unclear, the available information does not support a confident conclusion about the transaction’s cost or timing. That uncertainty is preferable to relying on an old description as though it were a live guarantee.

Payment information has a limited shelf life; static site descriptions may remain online after cashier terms have been revised.

The distinction matters because payment information has a limited shelf life. A site’s general content may remain online after its cashier terms have changed. Current cashier information therefore provides the strongest basis for understanding the operator’s stated conditions, while older summaries should be read as potentially out of date.

Using Bank Transfers to Pay for Casino Slots

A bank transfer funds a casino account; it does not pay for an individual slot spin. Once a deposit has reached the account and is available for play, the balance can be used on games offered by the casino, subject to its terms. The payment choice therefore concerns how money enters the account, not how a particular game is purchased.

This distinction matters when interpreting phrases such as “slots pay by bank transfer”. They can suggest that a transfer is linked directly to a slot, when the transaction is made through the casino’s cashier. The cashier is where the deposit method and its conditions are presented. Before proceeding, the minimum deposit, maximum transaction value, any fee and the account’s financial-limit controls should be checked there. Those details apply to funding the account, not to the mechanics of a slot.

A bank transfer should also be distinguished from a credit-card payment. UK Gambling Commission rules bar remote gambling licensees from accepting credit-card payments for gambling. The restriction also covers credit-card payments routed through a money service business; using an intermediary does not make such a gambling payment permissible. A transfer from a bank account is a different payment route, but the label alone does not establish the source of funds or the method accepted by a particular casino. The available option must be confirmed in that operator’s cashier.

For a “pay by bank transfer casino” search, the relevant practical question is whether the cashier offers a bank-transfer deposit for the account. It is not whether each slot has a separate transfer facility. A deposit can make funds available across the casino account, while game access remains determined by the operator’s catalogue and account conditions.

New customers must be prompted to consider a financial limit before making a first deposit, and account-level limit facilities must remain accessible afterwards. Setting a limit is therefore part of the funding decision, alongside reviewing the cashier’s transaction conditions.

Bank Transfer Deposits and Casino Payout Routes

A bank transfer used to fund a casino account does not, by itself, establish that a bank transfer will be available when a withdrawal is requested. Deposit and payout options are separate conditions of the account, and the available route can depend on the operator’s current terms and the payment methods enabled for that account.

A specialist review advises checking whether the selected deposit method can also be used for withdrawals. That distinction matters when assessing a bank transfer payment at a casino: the deposit may be accepted while a different payout route applies. Withdrawal methods, fees, limits and processing statements can change, so a previous description of the cashier should not be treated as confirmation of present conditions.

Before depositing, the payout route available to the account should be checked alongside any outstanding identity checks and the operator’s current terms. Account verification can affect whether a withdrawal request is ready to be processed; the applicable requirements should be established with the operator rather than inferred from the deposit method. The account holder’s details and the currency supported by the available route also need to match the account conditions.

The same checks apply when considering bank transfer casino payouts after a balance has been built up. A displayed payment option is not sufficient evidence that it is eligible for every account or transaction. The live cashier and the operator’s withdrawal terms are the relevant places to confirm the route, any applicable limits or fees, and the conditions attached to settlement. This keeps the deposit decision separate from assumptions about how funds can later be withdrawn.

What are the withdrawal limits when using a Payforit casino?

Payforit cannot be used to withdraw casino funds. Withdrawals must use a payout method available to your account.

Do all casinos accept Payforit?

No. Payforit is available at some operators, so check the casino’s cashier to see whether it is offered for your account.

Can I use a credit card at 333 Casino in Great Britain?

No. UK-licensed remote gambling operators cannot accept credit-card payments for gambling.

Which payment types are listed?

The listed payment methods include Visa, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, Paysafecard and several major cryptocurrencies.

Responsible Gambling

Material created by the team Kassu